We’ve compared it against the EF 24-105mm f/4.0L and the older EF 24-70mm f/2.8L, as many photographers will actually consider using the EF 17-40mm as their main general-purpose walk-around lens. While it clearly can’t zoom-in to anything you’d describe as telephoto, the 40mm ‘long’ end makes it more flexible for day to day use than

Canon EOS Rebel XS / 1000D review. Canon has today announced two new EF lenses; the 24 - 105 mm F4.0L IS USM and the 70 - 300 mm F4.0 - F5.6 IS USM. Of these two lenses the former will perhaps be the most interesting, promising a high quality wide zoom range in a relatively lightweight package and image stabilization it clearly lends it self to

1. There is no recognizable focus shift in macro mode. 2. Focus shift between f4 and f11 at 70 mm and minimum focus distance (38 cm) is about 3 - 4 mm. This is significant and will ruin most pictures. 3. From a focus distance of 3 feet and up there is no recognizable focus shift. It stays well within the DOF.

Review flare test results for the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Lens and compare the performance of this lens with other lenses. Canon RF 24-105mm F2.8 L IS

The major downside is price; at around $2,400 is significantly more expensive than both the Tamron and the non-VR Nikon option. Nikon 24-70mm ƒ/2.8G IF-ED AF-S ~$1,800. Similar to the Canon
. 387 301 9 248 350 102 275 157

canon ef 24 70mm f 4 review